Is it true that a generation or two ago churches all across America were more active and more committed to the goal of spreading the gospel than is the case today? Yes, it is true that only a percentage of the population who were active members of churches a generation ago are still active today. And why have so many formally active churches across our nation closed their doors in the last few years?
Those who have done the greatest damage to the ministry of churches in our country in the last half century or so have not been individuals on the outside of churches looking in. It has primarily been the members on the inside of churches, and we have done this in the following ways:
- We have taken the church for granted far too often. We figure that if the church has survived all these years, it will go on surviving and growing in the foreseeable future. It is easy to believe that no one would want to harm or make less effective the ministry of the church.
- We have localized the church by insisting that it belongs on a certain corner or in a certain part of town. We rope it off, wall it in and insulate it against the outside world. We see to it that it serves folks like “us” rather than folks like “them.”
- We limit its message to the parts of the gospel that people like to hear. We have been willing to let our churches go all out for brotherly love, streets of gold, pearly gates and things like that. We have insisted that our churches soft-pedal or ignore such weighty matters as justice, mercy and peace. We demand that it should stay out of such controversial matters as race relations, economic justice and international good will—for these can be and often are controversial.
- We silence the prophetic voice in our midst. A tar and feathers campaign is often organized in less than 24 hours to run out of town anyone who dares talk like Isaiah or Jeremiah or Amos or John the Baptist or John Bunyan and Walter Rauschenbusch. We seek to accomplish our objective by cutting off financial support until the congregation decides to get another leader who is less controversial.
- We make the church’s membership selective. We want people kept out whom we consider undesirable. That way the membership remains homogeneous and congenial, sort of like an exclusive club, composed of the right kind of people who live on the right side of the tracks.
- We cut off the church’s source of supply. Many churches neglect young people. We have often taught them little or nothing about the church, either about its history, its mission or its future. After all, training young people might intrude on their right to make their own decisions.
- We deemphasize its evangelistic outreach.
- We believe the church will grow by natural means as children of present church members come of age.
- We stifle its missionary message and spirit. We accomplish this by insisting that the church has more to do in our own communities than it can possibly do. Why bother with people all the way across the country or half-way around the world. After all, a church cannot do everything.
The greatest hindrances to the spiritual life of the church and the evangelization of the world are from those of us within the church. Even so, wherever and whenever we find the Word of God powerfully preached and heard and the sacraments administered properly—there it is not to be doubted is a church of God.
You can have the largest church auditorium, the biggest Sunday School and a steeple up on the church so high that it interferes with astronauts circling the earth, but the angels in heaven won’t give a holy grunt until some old sinner comes down the aisle on a Sunday morning and gets right with Jesus.